Our Sunday Best: Lit From Within

 
Typists

Dear Diary... Today I wrote the longest Our Sunday Best ever. I am going to be revising and editing this thing for the next ten years.


 
 

When writers explain the writing process, they categorize writing as both art and craft. The words themselves are the art medium used to create worlds. The shape and structure of those words on a page are the result of craft.

All professional writers learn the same process of putting words to paper, then learning that there are better ways to put words to paper, and finally, realizing that words to paper are the beginning of a long road of crafting and refining draft after draft into a final result.

Whether that result is a poem, a story, an essay, or a novel depends on the temperament of the writer and her/his chosen mode of communication. These disciplines have one thing in common— they seek to communicate the mysteries of experience.

Here are a grouping of glorious websites to help you consider both the art and the craft of the writing process (Plus one extra for fun!) :
 
 
WORDS
 
 
Harvey Fergusson 1921

I know six words and a joke about a kangaroo. Wanna hear 'em?


 
 

Wordnik is a new website on the scene that approaches words, and language, in a revolutionary way. Unlike a dictionary, Wordnik does not merely define a word, it gives you a full experience of the word. The search engine button, to give you an example, says “I always feel lucky.”

I looked up “book” and was given every definition that could be culled from five different dictionaries.

On the right-hand side were examples of “book” used in context grabbed fresh from the internet.

Below that, Wordnik listed a basic etymology (history) of “book” in a single sentence with a pronunciation key.

Beneath all of these pleasures, the page explodes with lists of synonyms, hypernyms, hyponyms, and more. At the bottom of the page there are pictures and sounds and comments and lists, all somehow related to the idea “book.”

Even though it is a primarily English-focused site, Wordnik treats all languages as a potential buffet. I tested out my terrible Spanish and my horrid French, which produced some interesting results. The Husband threw out a Russian noun, and this also provided a listing.

Oh, you are going to have so much fun with Wordnik!
 
 
CHARACTER AND PLOT (THOSE BIG WHATNOTS)
 
 
Fotothek df roe-neg 0006581 028 Bild Portrait eines jungen Mannes beim Schreiben

Ohhh, no. Plot's gonna run you extra. That don't come with the standard package, Lady.


 
 
Basically, all stories come down to one sentence:

Somebody or Somebodies

do something/have something done to them/want to do something

… and stuff happens that complicates

what s/he/they do/

how s/he/they react(s) to what is done to them/

or impede(s) s/he/them from doing something.

 
 
Okay, so that’s an oversimplification of a more complicated subject.

Sort of.

It’s really easy to get tangled up in knots over plot and character. Plot and character are craft-driven devices.

So, TV Tropes devised a list of character and plot issues called Books on Trope to help your sort out the major ideas about what, and how, those devices work.

TV Tropes is one of my favorite websites because it takes all the tropes (common themes, clichés, and character archetypes) you find in all forms of narrative, and plays with them.

That’s right! On this same website, you can look up any TV show, comic strip, musical style, and so on, and examine it.

And, if you have something to add, you can join their group, which is similar to a Wiki, and have tons of smart and silly narrative fun!
 
 
For a visual examination of how a standard plot arc works, you may want to check out this gem from Derek Silvers (whom I just discovered— he’s an interesting fella!). The link is called “Kurt Vonnegut explains drama.”

Vonnegut is one of the most interesting writers of the 20th century, and no one played more freely and beautifully with the conventions of plot and character, while still remaining thoughtful and entertaining. (Vonnegut was an expert at slipping in big ideas in sweet packages.)

I think, in fact I’m pretty sure, that I heard the exact same Vonnegut lecture. I did not take notes. I sat there with my mouth open the entire time the great man was speaking.

Thank goodness Derek Silvers managed to take fantastic notes, which he decided to share with us.
 
 
REVISION (DO IT TO IT!)
 
 
Fotothek df roe-neg 0006727 039 Weltausstellung für Buchgewerbe und Graphik 1954

For my sixth revision, I'm only going to work on rhythm. You tell that guy I'm gonna be here for a month, maybe two.


 
 
Are you still with me? Our Sunday Best is turning into Our Sunday Longest today.

If allowed, I will hammer on and on about revision. I can’t say enough on this subject. The rule is: All writing is rewriting. Rewriting means “to see again.”

When you rewrite anything, you first go through in large swoops looking at the pattern of your piece of writing. (This is after you’ve set it aside for a few days to a month.)

Then you hone in to examine the plot and character development to see that those things are working (They usually aren’t doing exactly what you want them to do.) You basically throw the first draft aside, pick out the chunks that are functional, and go at it again.

After you rewrite everything (twice or forty-six times), you move on to line editing, when you pick apart your writing word-by-word. (Hemingway was a master artist at line edits.)

Finally, you copy-edit (check for basic mistakes) and copy-edit again (you’ll find more mistakes), and you do a page edit (check your page numbers, margins, et. al.). (You are gonna keep finding mistakes and then someone else will check it over, hopefully a friend or editor or both, and they’re gonna find some weird ones.)

I’m skipping a few steps if you’re writing non-fiction. Between rewriting and copy-editing, you will fact check any item that can be verified. Always cross-reference your sources.

A bad source is a rookie mistake, and everybody makes them early on, but if you keep making them, you’ve tinted yourself as an untrustworthy narrator.

Still, it can happen. Easily.

Once, early in my writing career, I accidentally changed a man’s first name in a feature piece. He called me. He was locally famous. And he wasn’t happy that I had renamed him. I apologized and went to my editor nearly in tears.

I was 22! It was my third story. I thought, okay, that’s it! They’re gonna take me right out of the building.

To her credit, this editor laughed.
 
 
While features writing and all non-fiction require muscular fact checking, with poetry you are going to be doing additional rewrites that look at the shape of the thing. If you’re doing it right, it make take you a year to finish one poem.

That’s why you work on about 50 of those things at the same time. All will be in different stages of revision. Mark each one and staple it to the last one. That’s the best advice I can give you about poetry.

Oh! And never force a rhyme unless you’re going for a cheap laugh.
 
 
Okay. I’ve driven you crazy. I get that. Or you already know all of this stuff. I respect that too. You’re gonna love me for these three links, though.

For listening to me ramble on about revision, I give you the gift of Chuck Wendig: He’s a self-proclaimed freelance penmonkey. (I want to steal that, by the way.)

Wending wrote a piece called “25 Things Writers Should Stop Doing Right F***ing Now” and a follow-up piece entitled “25 Things Writers Should Start Doing.”

My friend K—— introduced me to the pleasures of El Wendig in December.

For four weeks now, I have not been able to stop shouting, “To the Resentmentmobie!” (You’ll see….)

He knows of which he speaks when it comes to writing. I really think you’ll love him, as long as you’re not allergic to profanity. Lots of profanity. Gorgeously written profanity. (He even joked on his twitter feed that he’s “starting to think my trademark should be ‘Beware the profanity.”)

I love his writing about writing. I’m looking forward to reading one of his novels in the next few months. And I adore the way he uses profanity. It’s funny and lyrical and intelligent.
 
 
If that’s really, really not your style, or you’re already reading Wendig, I give you this equally mouth-watering link to the fabulous site This Recording. Among other subjects, This Recording does killer, beautiful-to-look-at, lovely-to-read pieces on writers, both famous and specialized.

(And special props to This Recording for their feature story “100 Greatest Writers.” Yumtastic!)
 
 
DIGESTIF (YES, WE’RE DONE!)
 
 

Amelita galli-curci

Dear Ms. Bluebird: Please go suck an egg for your crummy advice. Yours sincerely, Ida Lemon.


 
 
Here we are.

You read this week’s Our Sunday Best and did not skip out on me. Thank you for that.

Everything I gave you today, my friend, I use. Everything I said today, I believe. And if you’re reading this, know that writers are made, not born.

The more you write, the more you develop both the muscle and the flexibility to write anything. The more you revise, the more you become a consistent artist and craftsperson. And the more you learn, the freer you are.

When you finish writing for the day, please, just once, play this game?

It’s called either Yeti Sports or Pingu Throw. The Husband found it back in 2004, and we’ve been competing at this thing ever since. (You may know it, and may have forgotten about it.)

It’s not bloody.

It’s very silly.

It’s free. (Though the creator, Yeti Sports, has gone on to make some cool looking games that cost a little bit!)

And I found the one site that doesn’t seem to be full of (too many) junky ads where you can play it after spending a day monkeying with words.

I love monkeying with words.

I spent all day today monkeying with words. So….

Let’s play Pingu Throw!
 
 
Penguins

Cecil? Basil? Roberto? Put on your helmets. We're gonna win this, uh, us toss, this time. Weeeee!


 
 

Advertisement
Tagged , , , , , , ,

17 thoughts on “Our Sunday Best: Lit From Within

  1. Man, this is a tour-de-force of relevance. And the Words and Revisions sections are great as well!

    • Whew! You have no idea how relieved I am to hear you use the word “relevant” in a sentence to describe this… ginormous Our Sunday’s Best.

      And I’m glad the Words and Revisions sections are helpful! I use all of these links either for work or for fun, which are the same thing sometimes.

      • And….and…..penguin….batting practice!

        Love your Plot guy. Reminds me of Alfred in Miracle on 34th. There’s a lota bad isms out theah, but ona the woist is bad plot-ism!

  2. :) Penguin batting practice is a must in my writing life. I hope everybody tries this at least once.

    This piece was a number of days’ worth of work, and I wrote the captions toward the end.

    By the time I wrote Plot Guy’s caption, I was cracking up laughing.

    You do a good local vernacular, by the way! I could hear this in my head. His voice is slightly high and nasal!

    Maybe someday I should do a Sunday Best just on dialogue. What do y’all think?

  3. Okay everyone! Within the next four weeks, I’m doing an Our Sunday Best on dialogue for writers.

    Brian Westbye inspired this idea, but I’ve been obsessing over the question of dialogue for years. So, here we go! YAY!

  4. yearstricken says:

    When I saw that first picture, I thought, Gee, that’s not how I pictured Courtenay Bluebird. I’ve always pictured you with wings.

    You are so confident when you write and as you explained what writers do, must do, I started feeling better and better about being a typist. We have none of those pressures; all day, just tap, tap, tap, like Gene Kelley but without the music.

    Thank you for all the links. I knew of Wordnik but not the others.

    • :) Please allow me a minute to compose myself. Bursts out laughing with glee.

      See, as I was revising this piece, especially the revision section, I thought, well, Yearstricken is going to be bored to the back teeth. She does all of these things.

      Honestly. No joke.

      Busts up laughing again.

      Remember we were talking about the typist thing? Well, it was directed toward Jack Kerouac. The going theory is that he did not revise his work.

      I can say with confidence that there is another apocryphal story about Kerouac from the same early period—— He apparently drove his downstairs landlady crazy because he would read aloud and pace as he revised. (I read everything out loud at least once, usually twice or more.)

      You can be Gene Kelly. That’s a perfect fit. He made dancing look easy and muscular and new. You do the same with writing. I’m a big fan of Gene Kelley’s work. And I’m a big fan of your work. So, Gene Kelly it is!

      Isn’t Worknik fun? I hope some of the others prove fruitful for you too. I’m always ferreting away new sites and information in this weirdly organized fashion on my bookmarks.

      I’m glad you think I come across as confident, but I’m honestly surprised. The reality is that sometimes I am and sometimes I’m not.

      I do what I can to use what I have and what I know, and I trust the process and my mentors, who gave me everything they had—— no holds barred. If I get stuck, I close my eyes and think of them. I was blessed with a big bouquet of honest-to-goodness mentors.

      So, I thank you, Yearstricken, for thinking this wonderful thing about me. And now you know, what I really do is sweat and write and read aloud and sweat and rewrite.

      One more thing:

      I do have wings. At one point I had the biggest, coolest pair of white wings you ever did see. They could sweep a long coffee table in one go. I donated them to a theater because I got tired of sweeping everything off of the coffee table.

      Now I have a pair of black wings that I wear sometimes when I play a library fairy. (That costume is: regular clothes with black wings and a stack of library books. Fastest Halloween costume ever.)

      What I really need is a pair of blue wings. I’m gonna start looking. :)

      • Pick me up a pair at the wing shop?!? I’ll pay ya back.

        • Of course! *Musing.* There are two pretty amazing costume shops in town. I bought my realistic, huge white pair of wings at one of them. As well as other things. (Like Inspector Clouseau, I place great faith in fake noses.) I will check out the wing situation for both of us!

          • Of course, given the cool people who stop by and leave comments on my blog, someone may already know the answer to this question!

            Hey y’all! Does anyone know where I can purchase a couple pair of person-sized blue wings?

  5. Great tips and links! Thanks for the head’s up, Bluebird.

    • Oh, I’m so pleased you think so! I hope any or all of these links proves fruitful for you in the long run. YAY!

      • Hey, I wanted to mention, I am the same Elizabeth that you have been chatting with on FB about this post. Just so you know. lol. Have a good night.

        • Ohhhhhh! See I’ve been especially slow this week!

          I’ve been talking to you, and separately geeking out over you cool blog name. And we’ve been talking about dancing. Thank you for putting this all together for me because sometimes I have to wonder about my brain. Seriously.

          Did you see the “hand-dance” post? I was thinking of you when I put it up. Also, the link I added to the poem from a few weeks ago was also for you– this Wim Wenders’ movie on Pina Bausch looks amazing.

          Please excuse me, I’m more slow than usual to put things together! But now (*raises finger*) I’ve got it! :)

        • Hi! I stopped by your blog this morning! I’m so glad we’re getting to know one another, honestly. Yay! Social media rocks!

Hey there, cupcake! How are ya?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 415 other followers